|
| Author |
Message |
mshkikianimoosh
Member
|
# Posted: 12 Nov 2020 07:24pm
Reply
Which one is better? I watched you Tube video which basically said they were both good but the catalytic required more maintenance. I have a Haugh S-121 with a Smoke Master. How would it match up against a late model stove?
|
|
Brettny
Member
|
# Posted: 13 Nov 2020 06:15am
Reply
No clue on how your stove stacks up against any other nor do I know how well reburn tubes work. I do have a catalytic stove from about year 2000. Just last year I replaced the refractory chamber and cat. I only did this because when I bought the stove (4yrs ago) it came with all those parts. Once a year I clean the chimney and take the stove apart to clean and inspect. I would think that's pretty minimal maintenance.
|
|
old greybeard
Member
|
# Posted: 14 Nov 2020 05:01pm
Reply
replaced our old smoker with a big Osburn 2300 epa tube stove 2 years ago.
Its excellent, 10 hour burns, even long heat.
See no reason for the expense of a cat
|
|
|
